Legal information, not legal advice. This site is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Every legal statement links to the official text. Not yet reviewed by an attorney. If you have a court date, talk to a lawyer.

Texas HB 31 (2023, Third Called Session): Outside Audits of CPS Investigations (Did Not Pass)

Status
Not law: did not pass
Bill
HB 31
Session
88th Legislature, 3rd Called Session (2023)
Last official action
10/06/2023 H Filed
The short answer

HB 31 is not law. Filed in a 2023 special session, it would have required DFPS to hire an independent outside auditor to review its abuse and neglect investigations in any year when complaints about investigations reached 15 percent of all investigations. The bill was filed but never referred to a committee or voted on.

This bill is not law. It did not pass. It was filed on October 6, 2023, during the 88th Legislature's third called (special) session, and filing is the only action in its official history Texas Legislature Online, History for 88(3) HB 31.

The short answer

HB 31 would have required DFPS to bring in an independent outside auditor to review its abuse and neglect investigations in any year when complaints about those investigations reached 15 percent of all investigations. The bill was filed but never sent to a committee or voted on. It died when the session ended Legislative Reference Library of Texas, What's Next? Post-Session FAQ, 89th R.S..

How far it got

What it would have changed

These points come from the bill as filed 88(3) HB 31, Introduced text.

When an audit would start. If complaints about DFPS abuse or neglect investigations in a year equaled or exceeded 15 percent of all the investigations DFPS did that year, DFPS would have had to pick an external auditor. The auditor would have been independent and not take direction from DFPS.

What the audit would cover. The audit would have:

  • counted the reports DFPS received during four randomly chosen months of the prior year, and how many it investigated;
  • found the reasons when DFPS chose not to investigate a report;
  • looked for problems in how DFPS responded to reports, including not investigating when an investigation was warranted;
  • checked whether DFPS followed its reporting and investigation procedures; and
  • made recommendations, including on staffing, organization, or training.

Who pays and who sees it. DFPS would have paid for the audit from existing resources. The report would have gone to DFPS, the legislature, and the governor.

Follow-up. DFPS would have had to make a plan and carry out all the recommendations within 90 days of getting the report. If any employee drew complaints in 30 percent or more of the audited investigations that employee handled, DFPS would have had to do an employment review to look into whether the complaints were valid. If the legislature or the governor found that DFPS had not addressed the audit, DFPS would have had to arrange another audit.

Which laws it affects

  • Texas Family Code chapter 261. The bill would have added a new Section 261.3092 88(3) HB 31, Introduced text.
  • What the law offers now. Because the bill did not pass, nothing changed. Current law already requires rules for resolving complaints about, and reviewing, DFPS child abuse or neglect investigations Tex. Fam. Code §261.309(a).

Ask a question

We read every question and add answers to the library, with official sources. We can’t advise on your own case. Please don’t include names, case numbers, addresses or other personal details.

Sources

  1. Texas Legislature Online, History for 88(3) HB 31 checked 2026-10-02
  2. 88(3) HB 31, Introduced text checked 2026-10-02
  3. Legislative Reference Library of Texas, What's Next? Post-Session FAQ, 89th R.S. checked 2026-10-02
  4. Tex. Fam. Code §261.309 · full text here checked 2026-10-02

Every legal statement on this page was checked word for word against the official sources above on 2026-10-02. Not yet reviewed by an attorney. Legal information, not legal advice.