Legal information, not legal advice. This site is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Every legal statement links to the official text. Not yet reviewed by an attorney. If you have a court date, talk to a lawyer.

Texas HB 2070 (2025): A Court Finding Before Most CPS Central Registry Listings (Did Not Pass)

Status
Not law: did not pass
Bill
HB 2070
Session
89th Legislature, Regular Session (2025)
Last official action
05/21/2025 S Left pending in committee
The short answer

HB 2070 is not law. The 2025 bill passed the Texas House but was left pending in a Senate committee. It would have barred DFPS from adding most people to the central child abuse or neglect registry unless a court entered a final order finding abuse or neglect, with exceptions for cases in child care, schools, churches, DFPS conservatorship, and certain reportable conduct.

This bill is not law. It did not pass. It passed the Texas House, but its last official action was "Left pending in committee" in the Senate on May 21, 2025 Texas Legislature Online, History for 89(R) HB 2070.

The short answer

HB 2070 would have stopped DFPS from adding most people to the central child abuse or neglect registry unless a court first found that the person abused or neglected the child. It had exceptions for cases in child care, schools, churches, children in DFPS custody, and certain "reportable conduct." It passed the House, but a Senate committee left it pending, so it died when the 2025 session ended Legislative Reference Library of Texas, What's Next? Post-Session FAQ, 89th R.S..

The same core idea, a court finding before a registry listing, appeared in a 2021 bill that also did not pass; see Texas HB 1190 (2021): A Court Finding Before the CPS Central Registry (Did Not Pass).

How far it got

  • Filed: January 24, 2025.
  • House: The House Human Services Committee approved a substitute on April 15, 2025. The full House passed it, with an amendment, on May 15, 2025.
  • Senate: It went to the Senate Health and Human Services Committee on May 16, 2025. The committee heard it on May 21, 2025 and left it pending. The official history shows nothing after that.

What it would have changed

These points come from the version the House passed (the "engrossed" text) 89(R) HB 2070, Engrossed text (as passed by the House).

A court finding first, in most cases. DFPS could not have added a person's name to the registry unless a court entered a final order in a civil, criminal, or juvenile case finding that the person abused or neglected the child.

Exceptions. A court finding would not have been needed if DFPS found that the person:

  • abused or neglected a child in a child-care facility or family home;
  • abused or neglected a child in a public or private school;
  • engaged in "reportable conduct" that requires listing in the state's interagency reportable conduct search engine;
  • abused or neglected a child who was in DFPS conservatorship (state custody); or
  • abused, assaulted, neglected, or groomed a child on the grounds of a church or religious facility, or during church activities off-site.

The church exception is also described in the Senate Research Center's analysis of the House-passed bill Senate Research Center, Bill Analysis, H.B. 2070 (89R), Engrossed, 5/20/2025.

New findings only. The rule would have applied only to DFPS findings made on or after the bill's effective date.

Which laws it affects

Ask a question

We read every question and add answers to the library, with official sources. We can’t advise on your own case. Please don’t include names, case numbers, addresses or other personal details.

Sources

  1. Texas Legislature Online, History for 89(R) HB 2070 checked 2026-10-02
  2. 89(R) HB 2070, Engrossed text (as passed by the House) checked 2026-10-02
  3. Senate Research Center, Bill Analysis, H.B. 2070 (89R), Engrossed, 5/20/2025 checked 2026-10-02
  4. Legislative Reference Library of Texas, What's Next? Post-Session FAQ, 89th R.S. checked 2026-10-02
  5. Tex. Fam. Code §261.309 · full text here checked 2026-10-02

Every legal statement on this page was checked word for word against the official sources above on 2026-10-02. Not yet reviewed by an attorney. Legal information, not legal advice.